My Extroverold Alien (more Crystallized)

To all of my followers, and readers, my mental active being has achieved a much more understanding of IT-self.  So much, that IT is going to have to rewrite many articles, and write more.  If my being seems that IT is more absent in its social media networks, it’s because there’s so much things to do.

My being may have to even delete many articles, so that IT itself can write them “anew,” instead of just rewriting them.  That’s how different this acknowledgment of my dividuality has clearly crystallized.  Now that my constructed mental active being clearly understands, that IT itself is not even of man, to then be considered as a human (of man), IT is more utterly as a definite humanoid (seemingly of man):  IT itself has acknowledged that my mental active being is of the hybrid species.  And not just any hybrid (e.g., an achieved scientific homogeneous hybrid experiments), but more of a mental heterogeneous hybrid (e.g., a hybrid composite of two different heterogeneous aspect and element, but not homogeneous in its mixture; remaining therefore, as a heterogeneous in its fusion).  Confused?  Not when my being will write an article about it.

It is a great and wonderful experience when one knows, in being, the structure of one’s own existential sentient soul (hybrid).  It’s great to be a heterogeneous hybrid species (humanoid, to others).

*

[Article Posted by: Sabiazoth]

[Writing & Concept, Created & Produced by: Sabiazoth]

[Aspaty: Dispace, Dormicycle 28, 12 R.L. E.C. (Solar North)]

[Image(s): Unknown]

0 votes

A Space (for A Place)

There is a space for everything, and everything in a place.

A space for a place, and a place for space.
A space for war, and a place to battle.
A space for peace, and a place to be in truce.
A space for fertility, and a place to be fruitful.
A space for desert, and a place to abandon.
A space for alpha, and a place to begin.
A space for omega, and a place to end.
A space for construction, and a place to contract.
A space for destruction, and a place to expand.
A space for sound, and a place to speak.
A space for silence, and a place to keep quiet.
A space for provision, and a place to preserve.
A space for move, and a place to remove.
A space for generation, and a place to copulate.
A space for degeneration, and a place to pollute.

Whatever it is in space, has already been done in any place,
For in a space of wickedness, a place for judgment must be placed.

Hence, there is a space for every activity, but a place to call each activity into account.

*

[Article Posted by: Sabiazoth]

[Writing & Concept, Created & Produced by: Sabiazoth]

[Aspaty: Trispace, Deutercycle 21, 12 R.L. E.C. (Solar East)]

[Image(s): Unknown]

1 vote

Consciousness 2 (what Is It?)

consciousness 2 (kon she’us – nes, noun)

 

  • Biological automaton thought that is instinctive.
  • Instinctual conditional automaton thought(s), depending on specific species.
  • Conscious (able to automatically instinctively thought-out, without sentience).
  • Material automaton, cerebral neural, thought process, and patterns—that are utterly not a distinct capacity of the immaterial mind (sentience/awareness).
  • A misnomer when consciousness 1 is adapted and applied as one in the same with the-Mind (sentient).
  • Thought as an instinct:  Thought as somatic.
  • Alertness, but no awareness:  Awake, but not aware.
  • Recognition, but no realization:  Training, but no learning.
  • Observant, but no insight:  Territorial, but no jurisdiction.
  • Memory, but no experiences:  Knowledge, but no acknowledgment.

 

Related forms

 

con-sci-ousadjective

con-sci-ous-lyadverb

non-con-sci-ousadjective (automaton instincts that are operative without an automatic material cerebral thought process; e.g., the multicellular small genus fresh water animal, the Hydra, has nerve cells without a well defined cerebral neural brain:  And any unicellular organism; e.g., the Diatom(s), a major group of algae).

un-con-sci-ousadjective (when the cerebral neural brain is in a slumber state from the automatic instinctive thought process – sleep).

half con-sci-ousadjectivehalf con-sci-ous-lyadverbhalf con-sci-ous-nessnoun (when the cerebral neural brain is in a trance state during slumber, with the automatic instinctive “para-thought” process – dream).

 

Origin:

 

Tetraspace, Servacycle 24, 11 R.L. E.C. (Solar North): ENG consciousness 2.

Gregorian:  August 16, 2017.

 

Word Origin & File:

 

consciousness (2)

11 R.L. E.C., acknowledged and produced of Modern ENG, consciousness 2; from con (L. prefix con-, meaning with, or together) + scious (L. suffix -scius, meaning having knowledge; but in this case, having automaton, instinctive, and “conditional” knowledgeable thoughts) + ness (O.E. suffix -ness, meaning state, or quality of) = consciousness (i.e., a state of being with thought and knowledge qualities).  The modern coagulum social state of “collective consciousness,” understands and make applications when combining the concept of consciousness as one in the same with the-Mind—or with sentient—or with awareness.  The matter of the fact is, consciousness (which is, thought process and patterns) functions without awareness (which is, the-Mind—sentient):  Such as all animal species, that are capable of thought process and patterns, as well as memory, but possesses no awareness—they are the species with mindless brains—and solely the human species are the one in possession of mindful brains.  The-Mind is immaterial; therefore, unable to possess any formation, patterns, or materials:  Thoughts, however, is a material process of the cerebral organ, that gradually develops patterns as impacts and stimulants are encountered with; and therefore, not a distinct capacity of the-Mind.  Consciousness is then purely and solely somatic—and the-Mind is solely psychosomatic, when the automatic instinctual thought process and patterns are maneuvered, and manipulated by the distinct will of the-Mind.  Therefore, consciousness solely process instincts that are stimulated: and the-Mind solely actuates “distincts” that are experienced.  The plural sense of distinct (e.g., distincts) is used to differentiate the contrasts between the instincts (such as, fear, memory, observance, affection, etc.) and the distincts (such as, sentience, will, intent, experience, etc).  And since the-Mind is solely immaterial, sentience (awareness) is then not a product of the material theory of evolution.

*

[Definition Posted by: Sabiazoth]

[Writing & Concept, Created & Produced by: Sabiazoth]

[Aspaty: Tetraspace, Servacycle 24, 11 R.L. E.C. (Solar North)]

[Image(s): Unknown]

1 vote

Jubiliah (a Story)

*

[Story Posted by: Sabiazoth]

[Writing & Concept, Created & Produced by: Sabiazoth]

[Aspaty: Monospace, Servacycle 21, 11 R.L. E.C. (Solar North)]

[Image(s): Unknown, but modified by Sabiazoth]

0 votes

The Center of the Universe?

*

[Picture Posted by: Sabiazoth]

[Writing & Concept, Created & Produced by: Sabiazoth]

[Aspaty: Heptaspace, Servacycle 20, 11 R.L. E.C. (Solar North)]

[Image(s): Unknown, but modified by Sabiazoth]

0 votes

The Male Man

*

[Picture Posted by: Sabiazoth]

[Writing & Concept, Created & Produced by: Sabiazoth]

[Aspaty: Heptaspace, Servacycle 20, 11 R.L. E.C. (Solar North)]

[Image(s): Unknown, but modified by Sabiazoth]

0 votes

Trump Administration

*

[Article Posted by: Sabiazoth]

[Writing & Concept, Created & Produced by: Sabiazoth]

[Aspaty: Trispace, Servacycle 9, 11 R.L. E.C. (Solar North)]

[Image(s): Sabiazoth]

0 votes

Distinct Vs Instinct

The Distinct

The coagulum of our modern social consciousness are prone to understand, and dispose, the concept of distinct to be characteristically connoted—referring to it as characteristics that are unique, peculiar, special and “distinguished.”  This is also applied to with animals, when people personify them as persons, and therefore, make them as distinctive.

The etymology of the word distinct derives from the Latin word, distincten, and it was used to make concise distinctions (not just to distinguish characters from one to the other), but mostly, to make distinctions between species—that is, to specify “action of distinguishing” between different creatures, according to their kind(s)—a separation/discrimination in nature and physiology (which was determined that the human species were distinct—greater than any other species—because of us solely possessing the-Mind’s awareness).  In late Latin, distinctivus, later was applied and attributed to differentiate unique traits and skills in different characters; and even in ranking positions/life (e.g., rich vs royalty).  Once the demarcations between different species were removed, especially, through the introduction of the empirical theory of evolution, even animals are now reasoned among humans that many of them too possess awareness (the-Mind).

The matter of the fact is, that the only thing (or aspect) that makes anything distinctive, is the-Mind (sentience/awareness), so that the-Mind itself is distinctive, and not instinctive.  And since many characteristics and personalities are biologically inherited, they are then not distinctive, but instinctive.  What does this then mean?

Since many characteristics and personalities are instinctively shared among many (in any species), they cannot be distinct, for there are many two characters alike:  However, when it comes to the-Mind, there are no two minds alike.  How’s that? You may ask…  Although inherited physiological characteristics and personalities are shared, how we experience them with our minds is how we (as the human species) become distinctive in comparison to every other mindless (unaware) species.

The immaterial mind of the human material brain, is equipped with seven distinctive actuating tools:  Besides from its major actuating tool (which is sentience—awareness), there is the distinct actuating tool of experience, which is only exclusive to each of its possessor—and this tool is actuated when the-Mind experiences the-Mind itself—solely then enabling the human species to become aware of internal and external experiences—thus making every single mind of the human species, unique (distinctive).  So without a mind, no creature can animate their inherited characteristics and personalities, distinctively.  Hence, the manner and disposition that one is experiencing his/her own inherited character and personality, in full awareness, is what makes him/her distinguishable.  If it wasn’t for the-Mind itself, the human species would be like any other species—just instinctive.

The Instinct

When it comes to the instinct, it can be very confusing with what is distinct.  As written in a few of my previous articles, when consciousness (which is nothing more but material cerebral memory and thought patterns) is applied as one in the same with the-Mind (which is purely sentience—awareness), that is a definite misnomer:  For thoughts and memory retainers are purely instinctive, and can function and be automatically stimulated even without the-Mind (i.e., in the absence of awareness).  That’s right!  Just like all the animal species that most all can think instinctively to survive, automatically, without the-Mind.  Any animal creature doesn’t need to be aware to function with his/her own thoughts and memories (and with some humans too, if their minds somehow become mindless—in sleep, sort of say—while their memory and thought patterns are gradually being developed)—they are automatically stimulated by their five senses that are impacted by anything (e.g., hearing, looking, tasting, touching and smelling).

The concept and application of personification in animals, nature and things, is what causes confusion between what is distinct, and what is instinct.  For example, the aphorism and axiom practice in personifying an idol (e.g., an idol that portrays a god/goddess) does not make the idol itself a person—the same in comparison to personifying an animal (e.g., a canine/feline pet, etc.) does not make it a person; so that the application of personification does not make a creature, nature (or thing), distinctive.

Even though there are variable different characteristic and personality instincts, that does not make them distinct, but only different—and here also lies the confusion when the concept of different is applied as one in the same with distinct.  A creature can be different in instinct, but without the-Mind, that creature cannot still be distinctive, but only different.  Just like flowers: a rose is different in appearance in comparison to a daisy—but they’re just different, and not distinctive:  You may want to personify the rose and the daisy as both being separately distinctive; nevertheless, the application and disposition of personification does not make a person (distinctive)—and likewise with all animals.

Distinctive Manifestations

Unlike all the animal species, the human species are the sole ones to manifest creations and concepts in substances, ideology and reality.  Most people are unaware that most and all of human creations are solely possible because of psychosomatic utilization and distribution—other than just our impacted automatic thought and memory instinctive patterns, because of the-Mind, only humans can also manipulate and maneuver our instinctive thoughts with distinctive influences.  And even though the human instincts are far more superior than all the animal species, without the-Mind, they would still be just instinctive, and not distinctive.

Because of the immaterial mind that’s solely in all humans, other than automatically instinctively impacting changes, we can also willfully and intently influence changes, distinctively.  This is evident in our ability to implement chronology (e.g., menology, chronometry, chronograph/chronometer, etc.)—to charge gender specifics (e.g., cisgender, transgender, agender, etc.)—to utilize thoughts (e.g., rumination, imagination, subvocalization, attribution theory, etc.)—to order identity (e.g., ego, solipsism, ipseity, individualism, name, etc.)—and to influence with the figurative heart (e.g., inclination, intuition, emotions, subjectivity/subjectivism, conscience, faith, etc.) is testimony that such manifestations would not be possible if it weren’t for the sole ability of the human psychosomatic capacity—to materialize in cynreality.

In conclusion, nothing is so distinctive without the-Mind—so that the-Mind itself is distinctive—from and by the-Mind itself.

*

[Article Posted by: Sabiazoth]

[Writing & Concept, Created & Produced by: Sabiazoth]

[Aspaty: Pentaspace, Pastucycle 26, 11 R.M. E.C. (Solar North)]

[Image(s): Unknown]

0 votes

The Extroverold Alien (Psychosomatically)

My instinct of surprise astounds my psyche-being on the more that IT comprehends its somatic form, of its own personage being.  The more understanding of my dividuality is achieved, the more of my dividuality becomes even more of a dividual.  My being use to think that my form of extroverold alien being was purely psyche (all psychological, and none physiological).  However, with the understanding, as well as with my internal experience(s), of achieved knowledge, insight and wisdom, has impact a different (or more in depth) comprehension of my social and psyche alien-being.

Now that my being has realized the reality that thought process (consciousness) in all species is instinctive, and not distinctive (of the-Mind), IT has come to understand that since the psyche-being (e.g., the aspect of the personage phenomenon of the-Mind) is immaterial, and therefore, unable to retain mental formation(s), all that is then accumulated in explaining and identifying my extroverold alien is somatic—cerebrally recorded in a biological physical containment (the material brain) in its memory and thought patterns—whilst my psyche-being remains formless; and to no wonder then, why IT remains uniformed and immutable—as well as impervious to external changes.

Indeed then, when consciousness is used and applied as one in the same with sentience (the-Mind’s awareness), that is a definite misnomer.

Consciousness is nothing more but a thought process that exists in all species with a brain (vertebrate/invertebrate)—a cerebral/nerve-spinal retainer that functions instinctual thoughts and memories without awareness.

Simply Put…

If my immaterial mind was somehow removed from my material brain, and put into a new different material brain, my immaterial mind would then start anew, all over again (e.g., in tabula-rasa), and totally become a new understanding and comprehensive person—unless, however, my previous biological thoughts and memories pattern were restored in the new material brain.

And—if our minds were possible to jump into someone’s else fully developed brain, we wouldn’t be able to carry with us the thought and memory patterns from our own previous brains—and the memories and thought patterns in the other material brain, that our immaterial mind jumped into, would then become estranged (alien) to us.

So the figurative belief in “astral projection” may be impossible to achieve—for one would immediately forget everything, once one’s own mind would astral project from his/her own cerebral body.

Further, the metaphorical belief in “disembodied consciousness” is truly fictional.  Since thought and memory process (consciousness) is purely biologically cerebral—in physical embodiment—it itself then ceases to exist once our animating bodies expire.

So if it were still possible that our minds would depart after the death of our physical animating container (cerebral body), we would depart not knowing anything—for our minds departed from what was biologically achieved, and now terminated.

In Conclusion

My status of being the extroverold alien person is then not solely psyche, nor solely somatic, but a correlation of both the immaterial (psycho) and the material (soma), in paralleled condition(s):  Simply put, purely psychosomatic.

*

[Article Posted by: Sabiazoth]

[Writing & Concept, Created & Produced by: Sabiazoth]

[Aspaty: Hexaspace, Pastucycle 21, 11 R.M. E.C. (Solar North)]

[Image: Sabiazoth]

0 votes

Alphaversary (what Is It?)

alphaversary (ăl-fă-vur-suh-reenoun)

  • The commemoration of a specific initial start, in a particular lunar space: in accordance to Hebrew lunar calendar.
  • An observance of an original commencement (the very first start).
  • The celebration of the first inception, before any other following inceptions.

(adjective)

  • The lunar spatial memorialization of an aboriginal: in accordance to Hebrew lunar calendar.
  • The lunar spatial celebration of a primary start (and not of subsidiary beginnings): again, in accordance to Hebrew lunar calendar.

 

Related forms

al-pha-ver-sa-ries, plural noun (misnomer; inappropriate suggestion; inaccurate).

(There are no plural to this concept; for every alphaversary that may exist, is different in comparison to each other: e.g., no two alphaversary are alike).

 

Origin:

Monospace, Vigercycle 6, 11 R.M. E.C. (Solar West): ENG alphaversary.

 

Word Origin & File

alphaversary

11 R.M. E.C., from Modern ENG, alphaversary:  From alpha (GK prefix alpha-meaning, “first in a sequence”) + versary (LT suffix –versare, meaning, “to turn”) =To turn the attention to an aboriginal (e.g., to memorialize/commemorate a primary/first start.”  “Alphaversary” entails the commemoration, or celebration, of an initial start that’s primary in comparison to any other beginnings that is following its own commencement.  For example, if the biblical first man, Adam, was still alive, he would’ve been celebrating his own “alphaversary,” for he would have been the initial primary start of the human species: any other after him, would be subsidiary (assisting) beginners of the human species, in celebration of their own anniversaries instead.  Another example, is that the biblical Satan is the alpha of The Rebellion; any other after him, are the following assisting demons (and humans) in rebellion against the biblical God.

Buddha Shakyamuni (born c. 6th–4th century BCE in Lumbini, India) is the founder, or the initial start (the alpha), of “Buddhism:”  Any other after him, are subsidiary (assisting) beginners in Buddhism.

Since my own psyche-being (Sabiazoth) is the initial start in being the ‘no-self’ (the ‘not-I’), that’s solely chaste to ‘The-Self’ (the-Ego/the ‘I’), the concept and application of celebrating my “alphaversary” of my initial aboriginal being is accurate, because unlike any other ‘no-self’ (anatta), my ‘no-self’ (anego) has no former self whatsoever:  Therefore, only my being can be the anego, of my kind.

Since my own psyche-being is also the sole initial start in being the extroverold alien, once again, celebrating my “alphaversary” of my aboriginal extroverold being is accurate; any other followers would be subsidiary (assisting) beginners in “extroverold beings,” celebrating anniversaries instead.

Not anyone can just apply the concept and application of “alphaversary.”  Unless anyone has an initial aboriginal commencement to any first start, celebrating one’s own alphaversary will be a total inaccurate disposition:  That would be a total misnomer; and possibly make one obstinate to continue in such disposition.  The concept of Alpha entails the initial start, and not just any other following starts, thereafter its aboriginal root.

*

[Article Posted by: Sabiazoth]

[Writing & Concept, Created & Produced by: Sabiazoth]

[Aspaty: Monospace, Vigercycle 6, 11 R.M. E.C. (Solar West)]

[Image: Unknown]

0 votes